首页> 外文OA文献 >Assessment of the MSF Triage System, Separating Patients into Different Wards Pending Ebola Virus Laboratory Confirmation, Kailahun, Sierra Leone, July to September 2014
【2h】

Assessment of the MSF Triage System, Separating Patients into Different Wards Pending Ebola Virus Laboratory Confirmation, Kailahun, Sierra Leone, July to September 2014

机译:评估msF分诊系统,将患者分成不同病房,待埃博拉病毒实验室确认,塞拉利昂凯拉洪,2014年7月至9月

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Prevention of nosocomial Ebola virus (EBOV) infection among patients admitted to an Ebola management centre (EMC) is paramount. Current Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) guidelines recommend classifying admitted patients at triage into suspect and highly-suspect categories pending laboratory confirmation. We investigated the performance of the MSF triage system to separate patients with subsequent EBOV-positive laboratory test (true-positive admissions) from patients who were initially admitted on clinical grounds but subsequently tested EBOV-negative (false-positive admissions). We calculated standard diagnostic test statistics for triage allocation into suspect or highly-suspect wards (index test) and subsequent positive or negative laboratory results (reference test) among 433 patients admitted into the MSF EMC Kailahun, Sierra Leone, between 1 July and 30 September 2014. 254 (59%) of admissions were classified as highly-suspect, the remaining 179 (41%) as suspect. 276 (64%) were true-positive admissions, leaving 157 (36.3%) false-positive admissions exposed to the risk of nosocomial EBOV infection. The positive predictive value for receiving a positive laboratory result after being allocated to the highly-suspect ward was 76%. The corresponding negative predictive value was 54%. Sensitivity and specificity were 70% and 61%, respectively. Results for accurate patient classification were unconvincing. The current triage system should be changed. Whenever possible, patients should be accommodated in single compartments pending laboratory confirmation. Furthermore, the initial triage step on whether or not to admit a patient in the first place must be improved. What is ultimately needed is a point-of-care EBOV diagnostic test that is reliable, accurate, robust, mobile, affordable, easy to use outside strict biosafety protocols, providing results with quick turnaround time.
机译:预防进入埃博拉病毒管理中心(EMC)的患者中的医院埃博拉病毒(EBOV)感染至关重要。当前的无国界医生(MSF)指南建议将待分类的入院患者分类为可疑和高度可疑类别,等待实验室确认。我们调查了MSF分诊系统的性能,该系统将随后接受EBOV阳性实验室检查(真实阳性)的患者与最初基于临床入院但随后接受EBOV阴性(假阳性患者)的患者分开。我们对7月1日至9月30日期间进入塞拉利昂无国界医生EMC凯拉洪的433例患者中的可疑病房或高度怀疑病房(索引测试)和随后的阳性或阴性实验室结果(参考测试)进行分类的诊断诊断统计数据进行了计算。 2014年。254(59%)人被认为是高度怀疑,其余179(41%)人为可疑。真阳性患者为276(64%),而医院感染EBOV的风险为假阳性患者157(36.3%)。分配给高度怀疑病房后,在实验室获得阳性结果的阳性预测值为76%。相应的阴性预测值为54%。敏感性和特异性分别为70%和61%。准确的患者分类结果令人信服。当前的分类系统应更改。只要有可能,应将患者安置在单个隔间中,等待实验室确认。此外,必须改进关于是否首先接纳患者的初始分类步骤。最终需要的是即时护理EBOV诊断测试,该测试可靠,准确,健壮,移动,负担得起,并且在严格的生物安全规程之外易于使用,可提供快速周转的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号